How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Style 3 Bluetooth vs Tune 520BT

Energy Sistem Style 3 Bluetooth vs JBL Tune 520BT

What Style 3 Bluetooth does better (1) and where Tune 520BT wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Energy Sistem Style 3 Bluetooth
Energy Sistem · 2022Style 3 Bluetooth
4.1Score
1 advantage≈ $30
vs
JBL Tune 520BT
JBL · 2023Tune 520BT
5.1Score
2 advantages≈ $30
Higher score
4.0Noise control & calls4.0
4.1Battery7.1

Why is Style 3 Bluetooth better than Tune 520BT?

  1. Driver size40 mm vs 33 mm+21%

Why is Tune 520BT better than Style 3 Bluetooth?

  1. Battery life25 h vs 57 h2.3×
  2. Bluetooth version5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 520BTJBL Tune 520BT≈ $305.1
Sound
FitOver-earOn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size40 mm33 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—30 Ω
Sensitivity—102 dB
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life25 h57 h
Battery capacity400 mAh—
Charging time2 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)—5 min → 1 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.15.3
Bluetooth codecsSBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Design & build
Weight—157 g
Foldable—Yes
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare