How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. SOT LBT-TWS19CS vs TAT1300

Elecom SOT LBT-TWS19CS vs Philips TAT1300

What SOT LBT-TWS19CS does better (1) and where TAT1300 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Elecom SOT LBT-TWS19CS
Elecom · 2025SOT LBT-TWS19CS
1 advantage≈ $18
vs
Philips TAT1300
Philips · 2026TAT1300
4.0Score
3 advantages≈ $18
Higher score
3.1Battery2.5

Why is SOT LBT-TWS19CS better than TAT1300?

  1. Charging time1 h vs 3 h3×

Why is TAT1300 better than SOT LBT-TWS19CS?

  1. Battery life4.5 h vs 6 h+33%
  2. Bluetooth version5.2 vs 6+15%
  3. Driver size6 mm vs 10 mm+67%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT1300Philips TAT1300≈ $184.0
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size6 mm10 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—105 Ω
Sensitivity—105 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—No
Battery & charging
Battery life4.5 h6 h
Charging time1 h3 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.26
Bluetooth codecsSBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Design & build
Weight—34 g
Earbud weight (each)3.3 g—
Protection rating—IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare