Why is LBT-TWS10 better than QCY-T9?
- Earbud weight (each)3.2 g vs 4.5 g+41%
Why is QCY-T9 better than LBT-TWS10?
- Battery life3 h vs 4 h+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 6 mm | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 3 h | 4 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 1.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 3.2 g | 4.5 g |
| Protection rating | — | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 6 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
