vs
2.9Battery7.8
Why is LBT-OWS03 better than Enco Buds3?
LBT-OWS03 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Enco Buds3 better than LBT-OWS03?
- Battery life5 h vs 9 h+80%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 12.4 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Spatial / 3D audio | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 5 h | 9 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 48 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | — |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Low-latency game mode | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 5.3 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IP55 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Belkin Activefit Sports In-Ear schwarz AUC016hqBKvsElecom LBT-OWS03vs
Elecom LBT-OWS03vsGuess TWS 4G Metal Logo headphonesvs
Elecom LBT-OWS03vsEdifier Comfo Flexvs
Elecom LBT-OWS03vsEdifier A6vs
Belkin Activefit Sports In-Ear schwarz AUC016hqBKvsOPPO Enco Buds3vsOPPO Enco Buds3vsGuess TWS 4G Metal Logo headphones