vs
5.0Battery2.2
Why is LBT-OWS02 better than ITW-4000-2?
- Battery life7 h vs 4 h+75%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 1.8 h+20%
Why is ITW-4000-2 better than LBT-OWS02?
ITW-4000-2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 4 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 16 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 1.8 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | — |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 9 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
