vs
3.4Battery3.5
Why is ILMF LBT-TWS17E better than Echo Lite E11?
- Driver size14.2 mm vs 13 mm+9%
Why is Echo Lite E11 better than ILMF LBT-TWS17E?
- Battery life5.5 h vs 6 h+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Semi-in-ear (open) | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Semi-open | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 14.2 mm | 13 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 5.5 h | 6 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 30 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 30 mAh |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 3.3 g | — |
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
