3.3Battery2.9
Why is ILMF LBT-TWS17E better than LBT-TWS16CS?
- Battery life5.5 h vs 5 h+10%
- Driver size14.2 mm vs 8 mm+77%
- Earbud weight (each)3.3 g vs 3.6 g+9%
Why is LBT-TWS16CS better than ILMF LBT-TWS17E?
LBT-TWS16CS has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Semi-in-ear (open) | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Semi-open | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 14.2 mm | 8 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 5.5 h | 5 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 1.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 3.3 g | 3.6 g |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
