How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. &me LBT-TWS16JM vs Crossky C30 T33

Elecom &me LBT-TWS16JM vs QCY Crossky C30 T33

What &me LBT-TWS16JM does better (2) and where Crossky C30 T33 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Elecom &me LBT-TWS16JM
Elecom · 2024&me LBT-TWS16JM
2 advantages≈ $35
vs
QCY Crossky C30 T33
QCY · 2025Crossky C30 T33
4.2Score
1 advantage≈ $30
Higher score
3.0Battery2.6

Why is &me LBT-TWS16JM better than Crossky C30 T33?

  1. Earbud weight (each)3.6 g vs 5 g+39%
  2. Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%

Why is Crossky C30 T33 better than &me LBT-TWS16JM?

  1. Driver size8 mm vs 10.8 mm+35%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earOpen-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size8 mm10.8 mm
Number of drivers—2
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—No
Microphones—4
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life5 h5 h
Total with charging case—25 h
Battery capacity—32 mAh
Charging time1.5 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.4
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYes—
Low-latency game mode—Yes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)3.6 g5 g
Protection rating—IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare