How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. WH950NB vs TAPH805BK/10

Edifier WH950NB vs Philips TAPH805BK/10

What WH950NB does better (6) and where TAPH805BK/10 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Edifier WH950NB
Edifier · 2022WH950NB
6.8Score
6 advantages≈ $110
Higher score
vs
Philips TAPH805BK/10
Philips · 2020TAPH805BK/10
6.0Score
1 advantage≈ $100
6.6Noise control & calls7.8
5.2Battery4.0

Why is WH950NB better than TAPH805BK/10?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · TAPH805BK/10: No
  2. Battery life34 h vs 30 h+13%
  3. LDACYes · TAPH805BK/10: No
  4. Battery life with ANC34 h vs 30 h+13%
  5. Bluetooth version5.3 vs 5+6%
  6. Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%

Why is TAPH805BK/10 better than WH950NB?

  1. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 7 Hz2.9×
Specifications

Side by side

Edifier WH950NBEdifier WH950NB≈ $1106.8
Sound
FitOver-ear—
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz7 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity91 dB90 dB
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones4—
Battery & charging
Battery life34 h30 h
Battery life with ANC34 h30 h
Charging time1.5 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 7 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, SBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXNoNo
LDACYesNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight296 g—
FoldableYesYes
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare