How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. W800BT Pro vs TAK4200

Edifier W800BT Pro vs Philips TAK4200

What W800BT Pro does better (3) and where TAK4200 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Edifier W800BT Pro
Edifier · 2026W800BT Pro
5.8Score
3 advantages≈ $35
Higher score
vs
Philips TAK4200
Philips · 2026TAK4200
4.7Score
1 advantage≈ $30
7.9Noise control & calls6.0
5.1Battery5.6

Why is W800BT Pro better than TAK4200?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · TAK4200: No
  2. Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
  3. Driver size40 mm vs 32 mm+25%

Why is TAK4200 better than W800BT Pro?

  1. Weight253 g vs 129 g+96%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAK4200Philips TAK4200≈ $304.7
Sound
FitOver-earOn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm32 mm
Number of drivers—1
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity91 dB85 dB
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life45 h45 h
Battery life with ANC26 h—
Battery capacity—300 mAh
Charging time1.5 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.4
Bluetooth codecsSBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight253 g129 g
FoldableYesYes
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare