vs
9.3Battery8.8
Why is NeoDots better than tiny HP-T70BT?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · tiny HP-T70BT: No
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
- LDACYes · tiny HP-T70BT: No
- Driver size10 mm vs 6 mm+67%
Why is tiny HP-T70BT better than NeoDots?
tiny HP-T70BT has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver type | Hybrid | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 92 dB | 98 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 10 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 12 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 40 h | — |
| Charging time | 1 h | 1 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 4 g |
| Protection rating | IP55 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
