vs
9.3Noise control & calls9.3
9.3Battery9.1
Why is NeoDots better than T1 Fidelio True Wireless?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · T1 Fidelio True Wireless: No
- Battery life with ANC12 h vs 9 h+33%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Charging time1 h vs 2 h2×
- LDACYes · T1 Fidelio True Wireless: No
Why is T1 Fidelio True Wireless better than NeoDots?
- Total with charging case40 h vs 48 h+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Hybrid | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 92 dB | 105 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 13 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 12 h | 9 h |
| Total with charging case | 40 h | 48 h |
| Charging time | 1 h | 2 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 15 min → 1 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | IP55 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
