vs
9.3Noise control & calls5.2
4.2Battery6.0
Why is NeoBuds Planar better than Buds T200 Lite?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · Buds T200 Lite: No
- Battery life7.5 h vs 7 h+7%
- aptXYes · Buds T200 Lite: No
- LDACYes · Buds T200 Lite: No
Why is Buds T200 Lite better than NeoBuds Planar?
- Total with charging case30 h vs 48 h+60%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver size | — | 12.4 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | — |
| Sensitivity | 92 dB | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Microphones | — | 2 |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7.5 h | 7 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 5 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 30 h | 48 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, aptX, LDAC, LHDC, AAC, SBC | AAC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
