vs
9.3Noise control & calls9.3
4.2Battery4.2
Why is NeoBuds Planar better than TAT2139?
- Battery life7.5 h vs 7 h+7%
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
- Total with charging case30 h vs 28 h+7%
Why is TAT2139 better than NeoBuds Planar?
TAT2139 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver size | — | 13 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 92 dB | 94 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7.5 h | 7 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 5 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 30 h | 28 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 50 mAh |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, aptX, LDAC, LHDC, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | — |
| aptX | Yes | — |
| LDAC | Yes | — |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
