How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. NeoBuds Planar vs KDT3000

Edifier NeoBuds Planar vs final KDT3000

What NeoBuds Planar does better (3) and where KDT3000 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Edifier NeoBuds Planar
Edifier · 2025NeoBuds Planar
6.8Score
3 advantages
Higher score
vs
final KDT3000
final · 2025KDT3000
1 advantage≈ $85
4.2Battery6.6

Why is NeoBuds Planar better than KDT3000?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · KDT3000: No
  2. aptXYes · KDT3000: No
  3. LDACYes · KDT3000: No

Why is KDT3000 better than NeoBuds Planar?

  1. Battery life7.5 h vs 8.5 h+13%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earOpen-ear
Ear cup design—Open-back
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency40,000 Hz—
Sensitivity92 dB—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life7.5 h8.5 h
Battery life with ANC5 h—
Total with charging case30 h—
Charging time—1.5 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.4
Bluetooth codecsaptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, aptX, LDAC, LHDC, AAC, SBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXYesNo
LDACYesNo
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-C—Yes
Design & build
Protection rating—IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare