Why is M90 better than NeoBuds Plus?
- Driver size101.6 mm vs 10 mm10.2×
- Bluetooth version6 vs 5.4+11%
Why is NeoBuds Plus better than M90?
- Lowest frequency50 Hz vs 20 Hz2.5×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | — | In-ear |
| Driver type | — | Hybrid |
| Driver size | 101.6 mm | 10 mm |
| Output power | 100 W | — |
| Lowest frequency | 50 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Sensitivity | — | 92 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 11 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 8 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 47 h |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Mains powered | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, SBC | LDAC, LHDC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| HDMI eARC / ARC | Yes | — |
| Optical input | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 6,050 g | — |
| Width | 133 mm | — |
| Height | 212 mm | — |
| Depth | 225 mm | — |
| Protection rating | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Controls | Regional Distributors | — |
