Why is LolliClip better than TAE2146?
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
- Earbud weight (each)7 g vs 14 g2×
Why is TAE2146 better than LolliClip?
TAE2146 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 90 dB | 104 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 39 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | — |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 7 g | 14 g |
| Protection rating | IP56 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx6 | — |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
