Why is H9 better than ED-M90?
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 50 Hz2.5×
Why is ED-M90 better than H9?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · H9: Yes
- Driver size40 mm vs 101.6 mm2.5×
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
- LDACNo · H9: Yes
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Output power | — | 100 W |
| Speaker channels | — | Stereo |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Stereo | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 75 h | — |
| Battery life with ANC | 45 h | — |
| Mains powered | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | LDAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| HDMI eARC / ARC | — | Yes |
| Optical input | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 6,050 g |
| Width | — | 133 mm |
| Height | — | 212 mm |
| Depth | — | 225 mm |
| Features | ||
| Controls | — | Regional Distributors |
