vs
Why is ED-W280NBPRO better than ED-M90?
- Weight32 g vs 6,050 g189.1×
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 50 Hz2.5×
Why is ED-M90 better than ED-W280NBPRO?
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | — | 101.6 mm |
| Output power | — | 100 W |
| Speaker channels | — | Stereo |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 24 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 92 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Stereo | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 23 h | — |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | — |
| Mains powered | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, SBC | LDAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| HDMI eARC / ARC | — | Yes |
| Optical input | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 32 g | 6,050 g |
| Width | — | 133 mm |
| Height | — | 212 mm |
| Depth | — | 225 mm |
| Protection rating | IP55 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Controls | — | Regional Distributors |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
