vs
7.2Sound7.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
ED-QR65Stanmore III
| ED-QR65 | Stanmore III | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 213 mm | 203 mm | +10 mm |
| Width | 142 mm | 350 mm | −208 mm |
| Depth | 217 mm | 188 mm | +29 mm |
| Weight | 5,300 g | 4,250 g | +1,050 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ED-QR65 better than Stanmore III?
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
Why is Stanmore III better than ED-QR65?
- Output power70 W vs 80 W+14%
- Weight5,300 g vs 4,250 g+25%
- Lowest frequency55 Hz vs 45 Hz+22%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Driver size | 32 mm | — |
| Output power | 70 W | 80 W |
| Speaker channels | Stereo | Stereo |
| Lowest frequency | 55 Hz | 45 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Stereo | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Power bank function | Yes | — |
| Mains powered | Yes | Yes |
| Battery powered (portable) | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| USB audio | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| HDMI eARC / ARC | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 5,300 g | 4,250 g |
| Width | 142 mm | 350 mm |
| Height | 213 mm | 203 mm |
| Depth | 217 mm | 188 mm |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx0 |
| Features | ||
| Light effects | Yes | — |
