Dimensions
Size comparison
ED-QR65Go
| ED-QR65 | Go | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 213 mm | 240 mm | −27 mm |
| Width | 142 mm | 439 mm | −297 mm |
| Depth | 217 mm | 192 mm | +25 mm |
| Weight | 5,300 g | 4,700 g | +600 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ED-QR65 better than Go?
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
Why is Go better than ED-QR65?
- Output power70 W vs 160 W2.3×
- Weight5,300 g vs 4,700 g+13%
- Lowest frequency55 Hz vs 43 Hz+28%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Driver size | 32 mm | — |
| Output power | 70 W | 160 W |
| Speaker channels | Stereo | 2.0 |
| Channel count | — | 2 |
| Lowest frequency | 55 Hz | 43 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Stereo | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 8 h |
| Charging time | — | 3 h |
| Power bank function | Yes | — |
| Mains powered | Yes | Yes |
| Battery powered (portable) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | — |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| USB audio | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 5,300 g | 4,700 g |
| Width | 142 mm | 439 mm |
| Height | 213 mm | 240 mm |
| Depth | 217 mm | 192 mm |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
| Light effects | Yes | — |
