Dimensions
Size comparison
ED-QR65ED-S300
| ED-QR65 | ED-S300 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 213 mm | 204 mm | +9 mm |
| Width | 142 mm | 351 mm | −209 mm |
| Depth | 217 mm | 231 mm | −14 mm |
| Weight | 5,300 g | 6,230 g | −930 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ED-QR65 better than ED-S300?
- Weight5,300 g vs 6,230 g+18%
Why is ED-S300 better than ED-QR65?
- Output power70 W vs 80 W+14%
- Lowest frequency55 Hz vs 48 Hz+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Driver size | 32 mm | 31.8 mm |
| Output power | 70 W | 80 W |
| Speaker channels | Stereo | Stereo |
| Lowest frequency | 55 Hz | 48 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Stereo | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Power bank function | Yes | — |
| Mains powered | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| USB audio | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| AirPlay | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 5,300 g | 6,230 g |
| Width | 142 mm | 351 mm |
| Height | 213 mm | 204 mm |
| Depth | 217 mm | 231 mm |
| Features | ||
| Light effects | Yes | — |
