How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. ED-QD35-BK vs Muo

Edifier ED-QD35-BK vs KEF Muo

What ED-QD35-BK does better (1) and where Muo wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Edifier ED-QD35-BK
Edifier · 2023ED-QD35-BK
1 advantage≈ $200
vs
KEF Muo
KEF · 2025Muo
1 advantage≈ $210
Dimensions

Size comparison

ED-QD35-BKMuo
263 × 16513382 × 21659
ED-QD35-BKMuoDifference
Height165 mm216 mm−51 mm
Width263 mm82 mm+181 mm
Depth133 mm59 mm+74 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ED-QD35-BK better than Muo?

  1. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×

Why is Muo better than ED-QD35-BK?

  1. Lowest frequency60 Hz vs 43 Hz+40%
Specifications

Side by side

KEF MuoKEF Muo≈ $210
Sound
Driver size76.2 mm—
Output power40 W40 W
Lowest frequency60 Hz43 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life—24 h
Power bank functionYes—
Mains poweredYes—
Battery powered (portable)—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.4
USB audioYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Design & build
Weight2,640 g—
Width263 mm82 mm
Height165 mm216 mm
Depth133 mm59 mm
Protection rating—IP67
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx7
Dust protection (IP)—6
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
Party / stereo pairing—Yes
Light effectsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare