Dimensions
Size comparison
ED-QD25ES60
| ED-QD25 | ES60 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 108 mm | 92 mm | +16 mm |
| Width | 184 mm | 190 mm | −6 mm |
| Depth | 95 mm | 98 mm | −3 mm |
| Weight | 1,020 g | 1,040 g | −20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ED-QD25 better than ES60?
- Battery life15 h vs 9 h+67%
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
- Bluetooth version6 vs 5.4+11%
Why is ES60 better than ED-QD25?
- Output power25 W vs 34 W+36%
- Lowest frequency62 Hz vs 58 Hz+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | 25 W | 34 W |
| Lowest frequency | 62 Hz | 58 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 15 h | 9 h |
| Battery powered (portable) | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| USB audio | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 1,020 g | 1,040 g |
| Width | 184 mm | 190 mm |
| Height | 108 mm | 92 mm |
| Depth | 95 mm | 98 mm |
| Protection rating | — | IP66 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx6 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 6 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
| Party / stereo pairing | — | Yes |
| Light effects | Yes | — |
