Dimensions
Size comparison
ED-M60DMR203
| ED-M60 | DMR203 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168 mm | 206 mm | −38 mm |
| Width | 100 mm | 217 mm | −117 mm |
| Depth | 147 mm | 285 mm | −138 mm |
| Weight | 3,070 g | 3,400 g | −330 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ED-M60 better than DMR203?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · DMR203: No
- LDACYes · DMR203: No
- Weight3,070 g vs 3,400 g+11%
- Bluetooth version5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is DMR203 better than ED-M60?
DMR203 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Driver size | 76.2 mm | — |
| Output power | 66 W | — |
| Speaker channels | Stereo | 2.0 |
| Channel count | — | 2 |
| Lowest frequency | 58 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Stereo | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Mains powered | Yes | No |
| Battery powered (portable) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| USB audio | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 3,070 g | 3,400 g |
| Width | 100 mm | 217 mm |
| Height | 168 mm | 206 mm |
| Depth | 147 mm | 285 mm |
| Protection rating | — | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 6 |
| Features | ||
| Party / stereo pairing | — | Yes |
