8.5Battery2.3
Why is Comfo Flex better than TAT2520?
- Battery life10 h vs 4 h2.5×
- Total with charging case40 h vs 14 h2.9×
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · TAT2520: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
- LDACYes · TAT2520: No
- Battery capacity70 mAh vs 40 mAh+75%
Why is TAT2520 better than Comfo Flex?
TAT2520 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Driver size | — | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 90 dB | 107 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Microphones | — | 2 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | 4 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 4 h |
| Total with charging case | 40 h | 14 h |
| Battery capacity | 70 mAh | 40 mAh |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | IP55 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
