How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Comfo Flex vs TAA6709BK/00

Edifier Comfo Flex vs Philips TAA6709BK/00

What Comfo Flex does better (7) and where TAA6709BK/00 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Edifier Comfo Flex
Edifier · 2025Comfo Flex
7 advantages
vs
Philips TAA6709BK/00
Philips · 2025TAA6709BK/00
4.4Score
0 advantages≈ $55
Higher score
8.5Battery4.7

Why is Comfo Flex better than TAA6709BK/00?

  1. Battery life10 h vs 7 h+43%
  2. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · TAA6709BK/00: No
  3. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 150 Hz7.5×
  4. Total with charging case40 h vs 28 h+43%
  5. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
  6. LDACYes · TAA6709BK/00: No
  7. Battery capacity70 mAh vs 58 mAh+21%

Why is TAA6709BK/00 better than Comfo Flex?

TAA6709BK/00 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOpen-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Open-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—10 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz150 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity90 dB91 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—No
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life10 h7 h
Total with charging case40 h28 h
Battery capacity70 mAh58 mAh
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.4
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXNoNo
LDACYesNo
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYes—
Design & build
Protection ratingIP55IP55
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5IPx5
Dust protection (IP)55
Colours—Black, Red
Features
Touch controls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare