vs
4.9Battery8.6
Why is Comfo C better than Push ANC Active?
Comfo C has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Push ANC Active better than Comfo C?
- Battery life7 h vs 12 h+71%
- Total with charging case28 h vs 58 h2.1×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx7+17%
- Dust protection (IP)5 vs 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 12 mm | 12 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 90 dB | 99 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Microphones | — | 4 |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 12 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | 28 h | 58 h |
| Charging time | 1 h | — |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 10 min → 2 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Low-latency game mode | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | IP56 | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx7 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | 6 |
| Colours | — | Black |
