How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Comfo C vs TAT3708

Edifier Comfo C vs Philips TAT3708

What Comfo C does better (3) and where TAT3708 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Edifier Comfo C
Edifier · 2024Comfo C
3 advantages
vs
Philips TAT3708
Philips · 2024TAT3708
4.2Score
1 advantage≈ $25
Higher score
4.9Battery3.0

Why is Comfo C better than TAT3708?

  1. Battery life7 h vs 6 h+17%
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx4+50%
  3. Charging time1 h vs 2 h2×

Why is TAT3708 better than Comfo C?

  1. Driver size12 mm vs 13 mm+8%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT3708Philips TAT3708≈ $254.2
Sound
FitOpen-earOpen-ear
Ear cup design—Open-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size12 mm13 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—20 Ω
Sensitivity90 dB92 dB
Battery & charging
Battery life7 h6 h
Total with charging case28 h—
Charging time1 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.4
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
USB-CYesYes
Design & build
Weight—50 g
Protection ratingIP56IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx6IPx4
Dust protection (IP)5—
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare