4.9Battery2.3
Why is Comfo C better than Space Travel?
- Battery life7 h vs 4 h+75%
- Total with charging case28 h vs 12 h2.3×
- Charging time1 h vs 1.5 h+50%
Why is Space Travel better than Comfo C?
- Driver size12 mm vs 13 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 12 mm | 13 mm |
| Number of drivers | — | 1 |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | — | 35 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 90 dB | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 4 h |
| Total with charging case | 28 h | 12 h |
| Charging time | 1 h | 1.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Low-latency game mode | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | IP56 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx6 | — |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
