vs
4.9Battery3.8
Why is Comfo C better than Svanar Wireless LE?
- Charging time1 h vs 2 h2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx5+20%
- Total with charging case28 h vs 24 h+17%
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 5.2+4%
Why is Svanar Wireless LE better than Comfo C?
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 10 Hz2×
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 35,000 Hz+75%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 12 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 10 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 35,000 Hz |
| Sensitivity | 90 dB | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 7 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 6 h |
| Total with charging case | 28 h | 24 h |
| Charging time | 1 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 8 g |
| Protection rating | IP56 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
