vs
4.9Battery5.1
Why is Comfo C better than Twins Blaze?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx4+50%
- Charging time1 h vs 1.5 h+50%
Why is Twins Blaze better than Comfo C?
- Total with charging case28 h vs 32 h+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 12 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Sensitivity | 90 dB | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | 28 h | 32 h |
| Charging time | 1 h | 1.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | — |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | IP56 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
