vs
Why is Comfo Bass Pro better than Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer?
- Bluetooth version6.1 vs 5+22%
Why is Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer better than Comfo Bass Pro?
- Battery life12 h vs 30 h2.5×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 12 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | — |
| Sensitivity | 90 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 12 h | 30 h |
| Charging time | 1 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6.1 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | Yes | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 6.5 g | — |
| Protection rating | IP56 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx6 | — |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Colours | — | Grey, White |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
AVIOT TE-W2vsEdifier Comfo Bass Pro9.69.7
vs
Baseus Bowie MC2vsEdifier Comfo Bass Pro
vs
radius Hear-scape HP-H300BTvsEdifier Comfo Bass Pro
vs
Huawei FreeClip 2vsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer
vs
Apple AirPods 5vsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer
vs
Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)vsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer
