How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Comfo Bass Pro vs HA-A30T3

Edifier Comfo Bass Pro vs JVC HA-A30T3

What Comfo Bass Pro does better (6) and where HA-A30T3 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Edifier Comfo Bass Pro
Edifier · 2026Comfo Bass Pro
9.7Score
6 advantages≈ $75
Higher score
vs
JVC HA-A30T3
JVC · 2026HA-A30T3
7.3Score
1 advantage≈ $75
9.6Battery6.5
8.7Build & features6.5

Why is Comfo Bass Pro better than HA-A30T3?

  1. Battery life12 h vs 9 h+33%
  2. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · HA-A30T3: No
  3. Water resistance (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx4+50%
  4. Charging time1 h vs 2 h2×
  5. LDACYes · HA-A30T3: No
  6. Driver size12 mm vs 10 mm+20%

Why is HA-A30T3 better than Comfo Bass Pro?

  1. Earbud weight (each)6.5 g vs 3.9 g+67%
Specifications

Side by side

JVC HA-A30T3JVC HA-A30T3≈ $757.3
Sound
FitOpen-earIn-ear
Ear cup designOpen-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size12 mm10 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency40,000 Hz—
Sensitivity90 dB—
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—Yes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life12 h9 h
Charging time1 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version6.16
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXNoNo
LDACYesNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)6.5 g3.9 g
Protection ratingIP56IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx6IPx4
Dust protection (IP)5—
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare