How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Wave Pro X vs ARTICA TEMPEST

EarFun Wave Pro X vs NGS ARTICA TEMPEST

What Wave Pro X does better (4) and where ARTICA TEMPEST wins (0) — every spec side by side.

EarFun Wave Pro X
EarFun · 2026Wave Pro X
9.4Score
4 advantages
Higher score
vs
NGS ARTICA TEMPEST
NGS · 2026ARTICA TEMPEST
7.9Score
0 advantages≈ $30
7.0Noise control & calls3.8
9.1Battery8.5

Why is Wave Pro X better than ARTICA TEMPEST?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · ARTICA TEMPEST: No
  2. Battery life90 h vs 80 h+12%
  3. Battery capacity800 mAh vs 600 mAh+33%
  4. Charging time2 h vs 2.5 h+25%

Why is ARTICA TEMPEST better than Wave Pro X?

ARTICA TEMPEST has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—40 mm
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Adaptive ANCYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Microphones8—
Battery & charging
Battery life90 h80 h
Battery capacity800 mAh600 mAh
Charging time2 h2.5 h
Quick charge (claimed)15 min → 10 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version6—
Bluetooth codecsaptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, aptX, LDAC, LC3, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes—
aptXYes—
LDACYes—
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE AudioYes—
AuracastYes—
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Low-latency game modeYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Design & build
Weight259 g—
Protection rating—IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx5
Foldable—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare