How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. OpenJump vs Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK

EarFun OpenJump vs Philips Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK

What OpenJump does better (1) and where Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK wins (1) — every spec side by side.

EarFun OpenJump
EarFun · 2025OpenJump
8.6Score
1 advantage≈ $60
Higher score
vs
Philips Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK
1 advantage≈ $60
5.0Noise control & calls9.3

Why is OpenJump better than Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx5+40%

Why is Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK better than OpenJump?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · OpenJump: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

EarFun OpenJumpEarFun OpenJump≈ $608.6
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designOpen-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size14.2 mm—
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Head trackingYes—
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Microphones4—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life11 h—
Total with charging case42 h—
Battery capacity60 mAh—
Charging time1 h—
Wireless charging (case)Yes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.4
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes—
aptXNo—
LDACYes—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
Low-latency game modeYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)7.8 g—
Protection ratingIPX7IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx5
ColoursBlackBlack
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare