How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. K2 vs TAH2000

EarFun K2 vs Philips TAH2000

What K2 does better (1) and where TAH2000 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

EarFun K2
EarFun · 2024K2
4.4Score
1 advantage≈ $20
Higher score
vs
Philips TAH2000
Philips · 2025TAH2000
4.2Score
1 advantage≈ $19
4.0Noise control & calls4.0
5.3Battery4.2

Why is K2 better than TAH2000?

  1. Battery life40 h vs 26 h+54%

Why is TAH2000 better than K2?

  1. Charging time2.5 h vs 2 h+25%
Specifications

Side by side

EarFun K2EarFun K2≈ $204.4
Philips TAH2000Philips TAH2000≈ $194.2
Sound
Fit—On-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity—123 dB
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life40 h26 h
Battery capacity—200 mAh
Charging time2.5 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)—15 min → 6 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.4
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion app—Yes
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare