How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. K2 vs HA-S36W

EarFun K2 vs JVC HA-S36W

What K2 does better (4) and where HA-S36W wins (0) — every spec side by side.

EarFun K2
EarFun · 2024K2
4.3Score
4 advantages≈ $25
Higher score
vs
JVC HA-S36W
JVC · 2023HA-S36W
4.2Score
0 advantages≈ $20
3.8Noise control & calls3.8
5.3Battery4.5

Why is K2 better than HA-S36W?

  1. Battery life40 h vs 35 h+14%
  2. Bluetooth version5.4 vs 5.2+4%
  3. Driver size40 mm vs 30 mm+33%
  4. Charging time2.5 h vs 3 h+20%

Why is HA-S36W better than K2?

HA-S36W has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

EarFun K2EarFun K2≈ $254.3
JVC HA-S36WJVC HA-S36W≈ $204.2
Sound
Fit—On-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm30 mm
Number of drivers—1
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life40 h35 h
Charging time2.5 h3 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.2
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Weight—157 g
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare