How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Clip vs tiny HP-T250BT

EarFun Clip vs radius tiny HP-T250BT

What Clip does better (5) and where tiny HP-T250BT wins (1) — every spec side by side.

EarFun Clip
EarFun · 2025Clip
9.3Score
5 advantages≈ $40
Higher score
vs
radius tiny HP-T250BT
radius · 2023tiny HP-T250BT
9.2Score
1 advantage≈ $40
8.5Battery7.7
7.7Build & features9.1

Why is Clip better than tiny HP-T250BT?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · tiny HP-T250BT: No
  2. Charging time1 h vs 2 h2×
  3. LDACYes · tiny HP-T250BT: No
  4. Bluetooth version6 vs 5.1+18%
  5. Driver size10.8 mm vs 6 mm+80%

Why is tiny HP-T250BT better than Clip?

  1. Earbud weight (each)5.7 g vs 4 g+43%
Specifications

Side by side

EarFun ClipEarFun Clip≈ $409.3
Sound
FitOpen-earIn-ear
Ear cup designOpen-back—
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10.8 mm6 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—97 dB
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—Yes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Microphones2—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life10 h10 h
Total with charging case40 h—
Battery capacity60 mAh—
Charging time1 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version65.1
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXNoNo
LDACYesNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYesYes
Low-latency game modeYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)5.7 g4 g
Protection ratingIP55IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5IPx5
Dust protection (IP)5—
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare