How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Clip vs Endurance Run 3 Wireless

EarFun Clip vs JBL Endurance Run 3 Wireless

What Clip does better (1) and where Endurance Run 3 Wireless wins (3) — every spec side by side.

EarFun Clip
EarFun · 2025Clip
9.3Score
1 advantage≈ $40
Higher score
vs
JBL Endurance Run 3 Wireless
6.3Score
3 advantages≈ $35
8.5Battery9.0

Why is Clip better than Endurance Run 3 Wireless?

  1. Charging time1 h vs 3 h3×

Why is Endurance Run 3 Wireless better than Clip?

  1. Battery life10 h vs 25 h2.5×
  2. Dust protection (IP)5 vs 6+20%
  3. Battery capacity60 mAh vs 65 mAh+8%
Specifications

Side by side

EarFun ClipEarFun Clip≈ $409.3
Sound
FitOpen-earIn-ear
Ear cup designOpen-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size10.8 mm—
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—130 Ω
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—No
Microphones2—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life10 h25 h
Total with charging case40 h—
Battery capacity60 mAh65 mAh
Charging time1 h3 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version6—
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes—
aptXNo—
LDACYes—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
Low-latency game modeYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)5.7 g—
Protection ratingIP55IP65
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5IPx5
Dust protection (IP)56
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare