How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Clip vs Endurance Run 3 Wireless

EarFun Clip vs JBL Endurance Run 3 Wireless

What Clip does better (3) and where Endurance Run 3 Wireless wins (2) — every spec side by side.

EarFun Clip
EarFun · 2025Clip
9.3Score
3 advantages≈ $40
Higher score
vs
JBL Endurance Run 3 Wireless
8.1Score
2 advantages≈ $35
8.5Battery9.0
7.8Build & features9.3

Why is Clip better than Endurance Run 3 Wireless?

  1. Charging time1 h vs 2 h2×
  2. Bluetooth version6 vs 5.4+11%
  3. Driver size10.8 mm vs 8 mm+35%

Why is Endurance Run 3 Wireless better than Clip?

  1. Battery life10 h vs 25 h2.5×
  2. Dust protection (IP)5 vs 6+20%
Specifications

Side by side

EarFun ClipEarFun Clip≈ $409.3
Sound
FitOpen-earIn-ear
Ear cup designOpen-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size10.8 mm8 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—98 dB
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—No
Microphones2—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life10 h25 h
Total with charging case40 h—
Battery capacity60 mAh—
Charging time1 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)—5 min → 1 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version65.4
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes—
aptXNo—
LDACYes—
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYes—
Low-latency game modeYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion appYesYes
Design & build
Weight—21 g
Earbud weight (each)5.7 g—
Protection ratingIP55IP65
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5IPx5
Dust protection (IP)56
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare