How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Air Pro 3 vs XX HA-XC72T

EarFun Air Pro 3 vs JVC XX HA-XC72T

What Air Pro 3 does better (4) and where XX HA-XC72T wins (2) — every spec side by side.

EarFun Air Pro 3
EarFun · 2023Air Pro 3
8.5Score
4 advantages≈ $55
vs
JVC XX HA-XC72T
JVC · 2022XX HA-XC72T
8.7Score
2 advantages≈ $65
Higher score
8.4Noise control & calls7.2
7.3Battery6.7
7.9Build & features8.6

Why is Air Pro 3 better than XX HA-XC72T?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · XX HA-XC72T: No
  2. Charging time1 h vs 2 h2×
  3. aptXYes · XX HA-XC72T: No
  4. Driver size11 mm vs 6 mm+83%

Why is XX HA-XC72T better than Air Pro 3?

  1. Battery life with ANC7 h vs 7.5 h+7%
  2. Earbud weight (each)5.2 g vs 4.6 g+13%
Specifications

Side by side

JVC XX HA-XC72TJVC XX HA-XC72T≈ $658.7
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size11 mm6 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones6—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life9 h9 h
Battery life with ANC7 h7.5 h
Total with charging case45 h—
Battery capacity45 mAh—
Charging time1 h2 h
Wireless charging (case)Yes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.2
Bluetooth codecsaptX Adaptive, AAC, SBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXYesNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
LE AudioYes—
AuracastYes—
USB-CYes—
Latency55 ms—
Low-latency game modeYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)5.2 g4.6 g
Protection ratingIPX5IP55
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5IPx5
Dust protection (IP)—5
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare