How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Air 2 NC vs TAT1209

EarFun Air 2 NC vs Philips TAT1209

What Air 2 NC does better (5) and where TAT1209 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

EarFun Air 2 NC
EarFun · 2024Air 2 NC
5 advantages
vs
Philips TAT1209
Philips · 2024TAT1209
4.1Score
0 advantages≈ $20
Higher score
8.6Noise control & calls3.1

Why is Air 2 NC better than TAT1209?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · TAT1209: No
  2. Total with charging case40 h vs 18 h2.2×
  3. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · TAT1209: No
  4. LDACYes · TAT1209: No
  5. Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%

Why is TAT1209 better than Air 2 NC?

TAT1209 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT1209Philips TAT1209≈ $204.1
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—10 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—97 dB
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life—6 h
Total with charging case40 h18 h
Battery capacity40 mAh—
Charging time1.5 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, SBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXNoNo
LDACYesNo
USB-CYesYes
Low-latency game modeYes—
Design & build
Weight—30 g
Protection rating—IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare