Why is Air 2 NC better than AMA92003?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · AMA92003: No
- LDACYes · AMA92003: No
Why is AMA92003 better than Air 2 NC?
AMA92003 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 8 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 5 h |
| Total with charging case | 40 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 40 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 1.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 3.6 g |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
