Why is U20 better than TAT2100?
U20 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is TAT2100 better than U20?
- Active noise cancellingNo · U20: Yes
- Total with charging case30 h vs 36 h+20%
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 6+11%
- Battery capacity35 mAh vs 50 mAh+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Sensitivity | 108 dB | 105 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 35 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 30 h | 36 h |
| Battery capacity | 35 mAh | 50 mAh |
| Charging time | — | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6 |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
