Why is TWE-48 better than WEAR7701?
- Battery life6 h vs 4 h+50%
- Bluetooth version5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is WEAR7701 better than TWE-48?
WEAR7701 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | — |
| Number of drivers | 4 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 48 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 92 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6 h | 4 h |
| Total with charging case | 30 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 200 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 6 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 4 g |
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
