How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. PerL vs EAH-AZ40M2

Denon PerL vs Technics EAH-AZ40M2

What PerL does better (2) and where EAH-AZ40M2 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Denon PerL
Denon · 2023PerL
5.0Score
2 advantages≈ $85
vs
Technics EAH-AZ40M2
Technics · 2023EAH-AZ40M2
6.0Score
5 advantages≈ $80
Higher score
3.0Sound4.9
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
3.4Battery3.7
2.9Build & features4.8

Why is PerL better than EAH-AZ40M2?

  1. aptXYes · EAH-AZ40M2: No
  2. Driver size10 mm vs 6 mm+67%

Why is EAH-AZ40M2 better than PerL?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · PerL: Yes
  2. Battery life6 h vs 7 h+17%
  3. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
  4. LDACNo · PerL: Yes
  5. Earbud weight (each)7.4 g vs 5 g+48%
Specifications

Side by side

Denon PerLDenon PerL≈ $855.0
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10 mm6 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life6 h7 h
Battery life with ANC—5 h
Total with charging case24 h24 h
Charging time2 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)5 min → 1 h—
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsaptX, AAC, SBCLDAC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoYes
aptXYesNo
LDACNoYes
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Alexa
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)7.4 g5 g
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare