vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
2.5Battery6.1
Why is AH-C830WNC ANC better than FALCON ANC?
AH-C830WNC ANC has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is FALCON ANC better than AH-C830WNC ANC?
- Battery life6 h vs 8.5 h+42%
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · AH-C830WNC ANC: Yes
- aptXNo · AH-C830WNC ANC: Yes
- Bluetooth version5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 42,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6 h | 8.5 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 4 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 24 h | — |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | Yes |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
