Why is AH-C630W better than TAT2206?
AH-C630W has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is TAT2206 better than AH-C630W?
- Battery life4.5 h vs 6 h+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 4.5 h | 6 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.7 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
