Why is WL5024 better than HE-R10D?
- Bluetooth version5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is HE-R10D better than WL5024?
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 35,000 Hz+75%
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 15 Hz+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | On-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 15 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 35,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 60 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 120 dB | 103 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 7 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC, aptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | Yes |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Colours | Black | Black |
