How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. True Lite vs TAT2139

defunc True Lite vs Philips TAT2139

What True Lite does better (1) and where TAT2139 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

defunc True Lite
defunc · 2024True Lite
1 advantage≈ $25
vs
Philips TAT2139
Philips · 2024TAT2139
7.0Score
2 advantages≈ $25
Higher score
4.4Noise control & calls9.3

Why is True Lite better than TAT2139?

  1. Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%

Why is TAT2139 better than True Lite?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · True Lite: Yes
  2. Total with charging case20 h vs 28 h+40%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT2139Philips TAT2139≈ $257.0
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size—13 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—94 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life—7 h
Total with charging case20 h28 h
Battery capacity—50 mAh
Charging time1.5 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
USB-C—Yes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Design & build
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare